A brief detour from chemistry, branching out into science in general today. This graphic looks at the different factors that can contribute towards ‘bad’ science – it was inspired by the research I carried out for the recent aluminium chlorohydrate graphic, where many articles linked the compound to causing breast cancer, referencing scientific research which drew questionable conclusions from their results.
The vast majority of people will get their science news from online news site articles, and rarely delve into the research that the article is based on. Personally, I think it’s therefore important that people are capable of spotting bad scientific methods, or realising when articles are being economical with the conclusions drawn from research, and that’s what this graphic aims to do. Note that this is not a comprehensive overview, nor is it implied that the presence of one of the points noted automatically means that the research should be disregarded. This is merely intended to provide a rough guide to things to be alert to when either reading science articles or evaluating research.
EDIT: Updated to version 2!
EDIT 2 (April 2015): Update to version 3, taking into account a range of feedback and also sprucing up the design a little.
Support Compound Interest on Patreon for post previews and more!
The graphic in this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Want to share it elsewhere? See the site’s content usage guidelines.
You can download the previous version as a PDF here.
Purchase in A2, A1 & A0 poster sizes here.
The second version of the graphic is also available in: Portuguese (courtesy of Marco Filipe); Russian (courtesy of orgchem.by); and Spanish, (courtesy of Carolina Jiménez at nuakas.com).
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Skepti-Forum()
Pingback: 12 ways to spot Bad Science()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Protect...()
Pingback: Rough Guide to Spot Bad Science | ΡΟ Π ΤΡ Ο Ν()
Pingback: More fantastic work from @compoundchem: A Rough...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Compound Interest | joshgarzastrength()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Rainfor...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Teachin...()
Pingback: Scientists and teachers take note, this is how to communicate science! | Logical Philosophical()
Pingback: Rafale 17 : Plogue, végétarisme et maladies, chocolat noir, validité scientifique | Paléo Québec()
Pingback: 12 Hacks to Help You Spot Bad Science()
Pingback: The Weekly Gnuz & Lynx Roundup: 2014/04/06 | The Call of Troythulu()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | the neuron club()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Neural ...()
Pingback: Science! | Deadline island()
Pingback: Um Guia Geral Para Detectar Má Ciência | COMCEPT()
Pingback: Calcium and BRIX - Page 27 - The Combine Forum()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | EES101 ...()
Pingback: Spotting Bad Science – For Dummies | SLEUTH 4 HEALTH()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Medical...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | News fo...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Discipl...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | MedBioC...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | E-Learn...()
Pingback: “A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science” | Trolio Strength()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Envirot...()
Pingback: Read: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Cracked Science()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Scientists Behaving Badly()
Pingback: A Rouge Guide to Spotting Bad Science | letstalkaboutscience()
Pingback: Thinking Aloud… | OldPiano.Org()
Pingback: Follow Friday: A rough guide to spotting bad science | bite my words()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Compound Interest | Palavrapateados()
Pingback: Ranter’s Digest: April 13 – April 19, 2014 | Ranthropologist()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Compound Interest » brnskll.com()
Pingback: How to spot bad sciencce | A cookbook for physics, electronics and IT projects()
Pingback: This Graphic Is a Rough Guide to Bad (Or Badly Reported) Science | Binary Reveux()
Pingback: Science Is Good ~ ian-scott.net()
Pingback: This Graphic Is a Rough Guide to Bad (Or Badly Reported) Science | Techbait Tech News()
Pingback: This Graphic Is a Rough Guide to Bad (Or Badly Reported) Science()
Pingback: Bad Science - Chart | Green CometGreen Comet()
Pingback: Know What You Are Reading - Bad Science is Everywhere | Terra BlogTerra Blog()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Sapere ...()
Pingback: This Graphic Is A Rough Guide To Bad (Or Badly Reported) Science | Lifehacker Australia()
Pingback: How to spot bad science | Mr. Riley's Science()
Pingback: Spotting bad science – is it really so easy? | Girl, Interrupting()
Pingback: Science 109 Spotting Bad Science | glenn2point0()
Pingback: Noted: April 2014 | Misc Marsha()
Pingback: A guide to spotting what is bad science. | IB Psychology @ Pamoja Education()
Pingback: The Pitfalls Of Poorly Reported Science | Steps & Leaps()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Pharmac...()
Pingback: Very Useful Infographic: “A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science” | Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…()
Pingback: Top 5 Reasons Why You Sound Crazy When You Denounce GMO’s | OldPiano.Org()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Effecti...()
Pingback: The Best Resources For Understanding How To Interpret Education Research | Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…()
Pingback: Musing: A Rough Guide to Bad Science | Assignments and Mathematical Musings from Mr. Kirk()
Pingback: Guide to Spotting Bad Science | The Big Picture()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Educati...()
Pingback: Infografía: Guía rápida para detectar la mala ciencia | Naukas()
Pingback: Infografía: Guía rápida para detectar la mala ciencia()
Pingback: This Week in Science / Pseudo-Religion News | Evangelically Atheist()
Pingback: Weekend Reading, 5.4.14()
Pingback: Spotting Bad Science – Otago University Advanced School Sciences Academy, University of Otago, New Zealand()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Digital...()
Pingback: Friday Finds | With Faith & Grace()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Compound Interest | Blog de Ana María Palos()
Pingback: Posterior samples | Sam Clifford()
Pingback: Guía rápida para detectar la mala ciencia: 12 claves.()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Compound Interest | digger666()
Pingback: SciCast 024 — Método Científico()
Pingback: Quando bisogna diffidare del data journalism… | LSDI()
Pingback: Khaloucha's Blog()
Pingback: 「それらしい嘘」に騙されないため全人類が気をつけるべき三箇条()
Pingback: Clinical Guide: Evaluating Research : Forensic Healthcare Online()
Pingback: Spotting Bad Science : Forensic Healthcare Online()
Pingback: A rough guid to spotting bad science | From experience to meaning...()
Pingback: Reading Science Articles is a Skill - Blogs, Books & Brews()
Pingback: bufale sanitarie su internet: ecco come dribblarle ! - Dott. Sabino Berardino Firenze()
Pingback: Cattiva scienza | New Ice Age()
Pingback: السعودي العلمي | الدليل المبسط لتمييز العلوم الرديئة - السعودي العلمي()
Pingback: 数据会说谎 | 数据新闻中文网 | When Data Meet Journalism()
Pingback: How to Spot Bad Science | Neurobonkers.com()
Pingback: SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION UNDER THREAT | Pearltrees()
Pingback: “나쁜 과학”을 찾아내는 개략적인 가이드 | 이노스터프()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Medicin...()
Pingback: “나쁜 과학”을 찾아내는 개략적인 가이드 | ㅍㅍㅅㅅ()
Pingback: Um guia geral para detectar má ciência | A vida, o Universo e tudo mais()
Pingback: #24: Método Científico | SciCast()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | School ...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science()
Pingback: Science Stuff - Not Chemistry Specific | Pearltrees()
Pingback: 4 Ways to be a Better Environmentalist | Greening Forward()
Pingback: How to tell if it's Real Science - Science Is OK()
Pingback: A Non-scientist’s Guide to Checking the Science Behind a Claim. | Science or not?()
Pingback: » How To Be Healthy()
Pingback: Philosophy @ MHS()
Pingback: Link Round-Up: Critical Reading, Writing, and Resolutions - How To Do A Literature Review()
Pingback: » Understanding Health Studies()
Pingback: COMCEPTUm Guia Geral Para Detectar Má Ciência - COMCEPT()
Pingback: Rychlý návod na odhalení špatné vědy | SKEPTIK()
Pingback: A Collection of Articles From the Past About Measles | CHRISTINA GEORGE()
Pingback: How to Spot "Bad Science" in 12 Easy Steps (an infographic) - Curiosity Crossroads()
Pingback: ohcomeonandance()
Pingback: The Chronic-ills of Rach()
Pingback: Spotting Bad Science | Notes from the JGR-Space Physics Editor-in-Chief()
Pingback: Documenter une controverse | Pearltrees()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Types of Scientific Evidence | Compound Interest()
Pingback: New A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science – Stephen's Lighthouse()
Pingback: Research Methods | Pearltrees()
Pingback: Guide: Bliv en kritisk læser af nyheder om forskning | Sundhed og Sygdom blog()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | HRF glo...()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Impact ...()
Pingback: #4 – The Soul – The Allowed()
Pingback: Education Research for Beginners | @TeacherToolkit()
Pingback: Mala ciencia – Una guía gruesa | Escépticos (AECH) **blog en construcción**()
Pingback: Погана наука – український переклад | M.V.M-n.()
Pingback: Do you know how to spot bad science? — Techmash()
Pingback: 如何辨识糟糕的科学研究? | 科学公园()
Pingback: A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science | Areas o...()
Pingback: Hoax spotting | Pearltrees()
Pingback: Critical evaluation of information – Situated window | inquiry learning & information literacy()
Pingback: Scicast #24: Método Científico – Podflix - #SciCast - Podcast()
Pingback: Spotting Bad Science | Data Literacy for High School Librarians()
Pingback: Nutritional sensationalism in the press – Food on the front page()
Pingback: The Sensationalism of Nutrition News in the Press. What to Think? – Food on the front page()
Pingback: Rigor Mortis: Confronting Shoddy Science to Save Your Field – Johnica J. Morrow, Ph.D.()
Pingback: Bad Infographics and Data Visualizations – Site Title()
Pingback: From the world pool: February 10, 2017 |()
Pingback: Skeptical of new health study? Great!()
Pingback: Skeptical of new health study? Great!()
Pingback: Rafale 18 : Plogue, végétarisme et maladies, chocolat noir, validité scientifique - Paléo Québec()
Pingback: Holistic professionals increase credibility()
Pingback: How to spot fake health news()
Pingback: 發現不良科學的粗略指南 – Bruce YPC()
Pingback: Week 10: Credibility Assessment Toolkit | Pearltrees()